🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision over how to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.